The latest response from the tories makes me think it might be “sue the government for lying” time. Here’s my thinking…
- first: "the independent Advisory Council on the Misuse of Drugs (ACMD), has previously advised that the recreational use of cannabis is a significant public health issue and can unquestionably cause harm to individuals and society. This was set out in a 2008 ACMD report, which can be found at:
Anyone notice that they are using TWELVE YEAR OLD DATA that is now debunked?
- second: "Prescribers, patients, regulators and policy-makers must have confidence in the effectiveness, composition and consistency of Cannabis-derived medicinal products to ensure patient safety. Cannabis-derived medicinal products should meet defined safety and quality assurance standards to ensure that they do not put patients at risk of harm. Risks to patients may arise from impurities and adulterants, and variability in the composition of active constituents.”
So… "…the effectiveness, composition and consistency of Cannabis-derived medicinal products to ensure patient safety. Cannabis-derived medicinal products should meet defined safety and quality assurance standards… Risks to patients may arise from impurities and adulterants, and variability in the composition of active constituents.”
Or put another way… someone has never heard of flushed hydroponic clone grows?! The flush removes impurities, and clones are exact copies. How "pure and exact" of a copy do you need?! How about vacuumed resins? edibles? etc. There are MANY ways to guarantee purity. Look at American for examples. Or… are you saying all the science and the politicians in the states are liars? How about all the businesses paying tax? Are they selling impure goods? Because slander is a thing now.
- thirdly: In 2009 Professor Nutt (drug advisor of the time) was fired for saying cannabis was ok.
THEIR ADVISOR SAID LEGALISE IT and then they went on to let an MPs hubby become the worlds largest exporter or cannabis.
How is it legal for the government to ignore data, lie, fire those who don't toe the line, and ignore a reasonable request from the people that is backed by science?
We need to find lawyers to take the case, and we also need a fund setting up to pay for them.
In court, they would either have to admit that they are ignoring the world and modern science, then do a u-turn… or do a u-turn and pretend it was all their idea from the start.
Also… I'm a tad high right now, so I am probably just waffling bollocks. Ignore me,
Submitted July 11, 2020 at 01:54AM by freenarative
via reddit https://ift.tt/2OeZPjS